Hip-Spine Relationship in THR

Dr Karen Bourns

Orthopaedic Registrar 2021

Definition

The effect of lumbar-driven pelvic motion on the functional orientation of the acetabulum through the arc from standing to sitting. A cup within the classic supine safe zone can still impinge and dislocate if the pelvis does not move normally.

Parameters

  • Pelvic incidence (PI) – fixed morphological parameter; angle between the perpendicular to the sacral endplate and a line to the femoral head centre. PI = pelvic tilt + sacral slope.
  • Sacral slope (SS) and pelvic tilt (PT) – positional; change between standing and sitting.
  • Lumbar lordosis (LL) – normally within 10° of PI. PI − LL >10° defines flatback deformity.
  • Functional anteversion / anteinclination – cup orientation relative to the floor; determines impingement in a given posture.

Normal Mechanics

  • Sitting produces posterior pelvic tilt: sacral slope falls, acetabulum opens anteriorly.
  • Functional anteversion increases ~1° for every 1° of posterior pelvic rotation.
  • This accommodates hip flexion without anterior impingement.

Pathology

  • Stiff lumbar spine (degenerate, fused, ankylosed): pelvis does not rotate posteriorly on sitting → no increase in functional anteversion → anterior neck-on-cup impingement → posterior dislocation.
  • Fixed flatback: pelvis posteriorly tilted in stance → functional over-anteversion → anterior instability in extension and external rotation.
  • Spinal stiffness defined as change in sacral slope <10° between standing and seated lateral radiographs.

Epidemiology

  • Fixed spinopelvic alignment carries a significantly higher dislocation and revision rate after THR.
  • Prior lumbar fusion is an independent risk factor; risk rises with number of levels fused.
  • Long fusions to the sacrum are the highest risk group.

Classification

Hip-Spine Classification (Vigdorchik et al, Otto Aufranc Award 2021)

GroupSagittal alignmentSpine mobility
1ANormal alignment, PI − LL ≤10°Normal mobility
1BNormal alignment, PI − LL ≤10°Stiff spine
2AFlatback deformity, PI − LL >10°Normal mobility
2BFlatback deformity, PI − LL >10°Stiff spine. Highest risk, malaligned spine that cannot compensate

Original publication Vigdorchik JM, Sharma AK, Buckland AJ, Elbuluk AM, Eftekhary N, Mayman DJ, Carroll KM, Jerabek SA. 2021 Otto Aufranc Award: A simple Hip-Spine Classification for total hip arthroplasty : validation and a large multicentre series. Bone Joint J. 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):17-24.

  • In 2,081 hips managed by this algorithm with patient-specific cup position and dual mobility for stiff-spine groups, 0.8% dislocation, 99.2% survivorship free of dislocation at 5 years.

History

  • Back pain, previous spinal surgery, levels fused
  • Previous hip dislocation and the position in which it occurred
  • Functional demands: deep or low sitting, cross-legged sitting

Examination

  • Standing posture and sagittal balance; whether flatback is correctable
  • Lumbar range, specifically the ability to flex
  • Hip range and fixed flexion deformity

Investigations

  • Lateral radiograph of lumbosacral spine and pelvis, standing and relaxed seated – the key investigation
  • Measure PI, SS in both positions, PT, LL
  • Δ sacral slope between positions = spinopelvic mobility
  • Standing AP pelvis for templating
  • Full-length standing films where global sagittal imbalance is suspected

Treatment

Planning by Group

  • 1A – conventional targets
  • 1B and 2B (stiff spine) – adjust cup target; strongly consider dual mobility. Many surgeons use dual mobility routinely for stiff spine with flatback, and for fusion of ≥3 levels.
  • 2A – pelvis posteriorly tilted in stance; avoid over-anteverting the cup

General Principles

  • Restore offset and leg length; soft tissue tension remains a determinant of stability
  • Consider a larger head, balanced against liner thickness
  • The Lewinnek safe zone was derived from supine imaging and does not account for pelvic motion
  • Sequence matters: lumbar fusion after THR alters the functional cup orientation the hip was planned for

Instability in the Stiff Spine

  • Head exchange alone rarely sufficient
  • Cup revision to corrected orientation with dual mobility or constrained bearing generally required

References

  1. Vigdorchik JM, et al. 2021 Otto Aufranc Award: a simple Hip-Spine Classification for total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 2021. PubMed 34192913
  2. Total hip arthroplasty patients with fixed spinopelvic alignment are at higher risk of hip dislocation. J Arthroplasty 2018. PubMed 29310920
  3. Creating consensus in the definition of spinopelvic mobility. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2023. PubMed 37294841
  4. The current knowledge on spinopelvic mobility. J Arthroplasty 2018. PubMed 28939031
  5. The hip-spine relationship simplified. Bull Hosp Jt Dis 2020. PubMed 32144958
  6. Hip-spine relationship: clinical evidence and biomechanical issues. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2024. PubMed 38472450

Reviewed by Professor Phong Tran, Head of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health. Last updated 10 October 2026.