Hip Bearing Couples
- Metal on polyethylene
- Ceramic on polyethylene
- Ceramic on ceramic
- Ceramic on metal and metal on metal are now rarely used
Wear Modes
- Mode 1 is wear between the two intended bearing surfaces
- Mode 2 is an intended surface against a nonintended one, such as a head against an exposed metal shell
- Mode 3 is third body wear from cement, bone or metal debris
- Mode 4 is two nonbearing surfaces, such as modular backside or taper fretting
Wear Mechanisms
- Adhesive, abrasive, fatigue and corrosive wear
- Particles of 0.1 to 1 micron are the most biologically active
- Macrophage response to particles drives osteolysis and loosening
- Linear wear of conventional polyethylene above about 0.1 mm per year is linked to osteolysis
Materials
- Highly crosslinked polyethylene greatly reduces wear, and vitamin E stabilised variants limit oxidation
- Alumina and zirconia toughened alumina ceramics have low wear but can fracture, chip or squeak
- Early zirconia heads were withdrawn after fractures
- Metal on metal bearings release ions and caused adverse reactions to metal debris, pseudotumour and the ASR recall
- Larger heads reduce dislocation but increase volumetric wear and taper stress
Knee
- Cobalt chrome femoral component on polyethylene is standard
- Backside wear occurs with modular tibial trays
- Mobile bearings show no consistent benefit over fixed bearings
- Oxidised zirconium suits metal sensitivity
Registry Data
- AOANJRR Annual Report 2025
- AOANJRR 2025 supplementary report on comparative prosthesis performance
- AOANJRR 2025 supplementary report on metal on metal bearings
Written by Western Health Orthopaedic Department
Last updated October 2026
Reviewed by Professor Phong Tran, Head of Orthopaedic Surgery, Western Health. Last updated 15 October 2026.