OrthoFracs Logo

Polymethylmethacrylate

Bone Cement

Reviewed by

Dr Saeed Asadollahi
MBBS
Unaccredited Orthopaedic Registrar

History

  • Otto Röhm 1st developed PMMA in 1901.
  • PMMA use in orthopaedics: 1940s
  • Modern success with PMMA is due to Sir John Charnley`s work.

Composition

  • 1-Polymer powder
    • (More variable in different brands)
    • Copolymer 83% to 99%
    • Radiopacifier
    • Initiator
    • Antibiotic
  • 2-Monomer liquid
    • (Constant in different brands)
    • MMA 97% to 99%
    • Accelator
    • Stabiliser

Properties (Reaction)

  • Reaction: Combining powder and liquid monomer initiates an exothermic reaction.
  • In vivo temperatures are reported to be between 40° and 56°C.
  • Free radical polymerisation from the
  • monomer methyl methacrylate

Properties (curing)

  • 1-Mixing
  • 2-Sticky (Low viscosity)
  • 3-Working (high viscosity)
  • 4-Hardening

Variations

  • Endogenous factors:
    • component variations
    • formulation ratio
    • molecular weight
    • physical size of specimen
  •  Exogenous factors:
    • entrapped air
    • handling and mixing times
    • water and body fluid
    • temperature
    • sterilisation

Exogenous factors

  • Entrapped Air:
    • ↑ porosity → ↓ fatigue life of cement
    • ↑ handling time → ↑  porosity → ↓fatigue life of  cement
    • vacuum mixing/ centrifugation → ↑ fatigue life of  cement
  • Water and body fluid / moisture
    •  ↑ water content → ↓ in fatigue life and tensile strength
    •  Incorporation of blood into cement → ↓ compressive strength by 8% to 16%.
    • (↓ peak temperature by circulating blood)
    •  Relative humidity > 40% → ↓ working time
  • Ambient Temperature
    • temp → ↑ polymerisation rate → ↓ working and setting times
  • Sterilization
    • Radiation
      • The most prevalent
      • ↓molecular weight of PMMA → ↓ fatigue life
    • Ethylene oxide
      • More time-consuming and expensive alternative
        • No effect on molecular weight of PMMA

Contemporary uses of PMMA

  • Arthroplasty
    •  provides stability
    •  PMMA has no adhesive properties to implants on a molecular level.
    •  The quality of apposition between the implant-cement and bone-cement interfaces → the longevity of a cemented prosthesis.
    • Implant fixation within bone cement
      • Enhancing fixation minimising motion
      • Minimising cement abrasion in presence of motion
      • Sharp edged” and undercutting geometry presented highest gap/crack rates.
    • Prosthesis design and its affect of cement
      •  Anatomically shaped prosthesis →Uniform cement mantle thickness
      •  Collared stem →↓ tensile strength on proximal cement mantle
      •  Low elasticity modulus → ↑ stress imparted on mantle
  • Infection
    • Antibiotic loaded cement
      • Treatment of active infection
      • Prophylactic use
      • Role in maintaining soft tissue tension
    • Antibiotic beads
      • advantage: large surface area
      • disadvantage: difficulty in removal, soft tissue intrusion
    • How long is the duration of antibiotic elution?   
      • Several months
    • What the chance of systemic toxicity given the high dose of local antibiotic?   
      • Rarely happens
  • Spine
    • Vertebral augmentation (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty)
    • Aim: to restore the compressive strength and stiffness of the involved vertebra
    • Advantage: rapid cure to mechanically sound state →  immediate mobilisation

Complications

  • Cardiopulmonary complications
    • Reported in hip arthroplasty and vertebral augmentation
    • Likely mechanism: embolisation of marrow debris and neurogenic reflex

Summary

  • Composition and properties of PMMA has not been completely understood.
  • Understanding of the exogenous factors affecting the mechanical properties of the cement is important in its application.
  • PMMA plays a significant role in orthopaedics.
  • PMMA application in treatment of infection is evolving.

References

  • Todd Jaeblon, Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent Mercy MC, Toledo, OH, J Am Acad Orthop Surg2010;18:297-305
  • Caroline Duval-Terrié and Laurent Lebrun. Polymerization and Characterization of PMMA. Polymer Chemistry Laboratory Experiments for Undergraduate Students. J. Chem. Educ., 2006, 83 (3), p 443
  • Gladius Lewis. Properties of Antibiotic-Loaded Acrylic Bone Cements for Use in Cemented Arthroplasties: A State-of-the-Art Review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2009 89B: 558–574
  • Macaulay W, Digiovanni CW, Restrepo A, et al. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Aug;17(5):569-75.
  • Crowninshield R: Femoral hip implant fixation within bone cement. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics 2001;11: 296-299.
  • Gravius S, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH, et al. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs. J Biomech 2008;41:2021-2028.
  • Miller MA, Race A, Gupta S, Higham P, Clarke MT, Mann KA: The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: An in vitro model with medullary bleeding. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:109-116.