Polymethylmethacrylate
Bone Cement
Reviewed by
Dr Saeed Asadollahi
MBBS
Unaccredited Orthopaedic Registrar
History
- Otto Röhm 1st developed PMMA in 1901.
- PMMA use in orthopaedics: 1940s
- Modern success with PMMA is due to Sir John Charnley`s work.
Composition
- 1-Polymer powder
- (More variable in different brands)
- Copolymer 83% to 99%
- Radiopacifier
- Initiator
- Antibiotic
- 2-Monomer liquid
- (Constant in different brands)
- MMA 97% to 99%
- Accelator
- Stabiliser
Properties (Reaction)
- Reaction: Combining powder and liquid monomer initiates an exothermic reaction.
- In vivo temperatures are reported to be between 40° and 56°C.
- Free radical polymerisation from the
- monomer methyl methacrylate
Properties (curing)
- 1-Mixing
- 2-Sticky (Low viscosity)
- 3-Working (high viscosity)
- 4-Hardening
Variations
- Endogenous factors:
- component variations
- formulation ratio
- molecular weight
- physical size of specimen
- Exogenous factors:
- entrapped air
- handling and mixing times
- water and body fluid
- temperature
- sterilisation
Exogenous factors
- Entrapped Air:
- ↑ porosity → ↓ fatigue life of cement
- ↑ handling time → ↑ porosity → ↓fatigue life of cement
- vacuum mixing/ centrifugation → ↑ fatigue life of cement
- Water and body fluid / moisture
- ↑ water content → ↓ in fatigue life and tensile strength
- Incorporation of blood into cement → ↓ compressive strength by 8% to 16%.
- (↓ peak temperature by circulating blood)
- Relative humidity > 40% → ↓ working time
- Ambient Temperature
- ↑ temp → ↑ polymerisation rate → ↓ working and setting times
- Sterilization
- Radiation
- The most prevalent
- ↓molecular weight of PMMA → ↓ fatigue life
- Ethylene oxide
- More time-consuming and expensive alternative
- No effect on molecular weight of PMMA
- More time-consuming and expensive alternative
- Radiation
Contemporary uses of PMMA
- Arthroplasty
- provides stability
- PMMA has no adhesive properties to implants on a molecular level.
- The quality of apposition between the implant-cement and bone-cement interfaces → the longevity of a cemented prosthesis.
- Implant fixation within bone cement
- Enhancing fixation minimising motion
- Minimising cement abrasion in presence of motion
- Sharp edged” and undercutting geometry presented highest gap/crack rates.
- Prosthesis design and its affect of cement
- Anatomically shaped prosthesis →Uniform cement mantle thickness
- Collared stem →↓ tensile strength on proximal cement mantle
- Low elasticity modulus → ↑ stress imparted on mantle
- Infection
- Antibiotic loaded cement
- Treatment of active infection
- Prophylactic use
- Role in maintaining soft tissue tension
- Antibiotic beads
- advantage: large surface area
- disadvantage: difficulty in removal, soft tissue intrusion
- How long is the duration of antibiotic elution?
- Several months
- Several months
- What the chance of systemic toxicity given the high dose of local antibiotic?
- Rarely happens
- Antibiotic loaded cement
- Spine
- Vertebral augmentation (vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty)
- Aim: to restore the compressive strength and stiffness of the involved vertebra
- Advantage: rapid cure to mechanically sound state → immediate mobilisation
Complications
- Cardiopulmonary complications
- Reported in hip arthroplasty and vertebral augmentation
- Likely mechanism: embolisation of marrow debris and neurogenic reflex
Summary
- Composition and properties of PMMA has not been completely understood.
- Understanding of the exogenous factors affecting the mechanical properties of the cement is important in its application.
- PMMA plays a significant role in orthopaedics.
- PMMA application in treatment of infection is evolving.
References
- Todd Jaeblon, Department of Orthopaedics, St. Vincent Mercy MC, Toledo, OH, J Am Acad Orthop Surg2010;18:297-305
- Caroline Duval-Terrié and Laurent Lebrun. Polymerization and Characterization of PMMA. Polymer Chemistry Laboratory Experiments for Undergraduate Students. J. Chem. Educ., 2006, 83 (3), p 443
- Gladius Lewis. Properties of Antibiotic-Loaded Acrylic Bone Cements for Use in Cemented Arthroplasties: A State-of-the-Art Review. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater. 2009 89B: 558–574
- Macaulay W, Digiovanni CW, Restrepo A, et al. Differences in bone-cement porosity by vacuum mixing, centrifugation, and hand mixing. J Arthroplasty. 2002 Aug;17(5):569-75.
- Crowninshield R: Femoral hip implant fixation within bone cement. Operative Techniques in Orthopaedics 2001;11: 296-299.
- Gravius S, Wirtz DC, Siebert CH, et al. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs. J Biomech 2008;41:2021-2028.
- Miller MA, Race A, Gupta S, Higham P, Clarke MT, Mann KA: The role of cement viscosity on cement-bone apposition and strength: An in vitro model with medullary bleeding. J Arthroplasty 2007;22:109-116.

