Indications
- Major indication is pain from incongruous GHJ which is unresponsive to non surgical treatment
- Operation is less often performed for loss of motion as return of movement less predictable than pain relief with TSR
- Neer et al 1982 – four considerations at time of unconstrained TSR to limit complications
- 1. Osseous deficiency of glenoid or humeral head
- 2. Defective rotator cuff
- 3. Deficient deltoid muscle due to axillary n palsy
- 4. Chronic instability
- Indications for TSR
- RA
- Osteoarthritis
- Primary Osteoarthritis
- Post traumatic Osteoarthritis
- Cuff arthropathy
- AVN with secondary glenoid changes
- Indications for Hemiarthroplasty
- Fracture
- Four-part NOH fracture
- Head splitting fracture
- Elderly patients with NOH non-union (esp. anatomical NOH fracture with AVN)
- Dislocation
- Locked dislocation
- Recurrent dislocation with Hill-Sachs lesion > 50%
- Fracture
- Contraindications
- Acute or persistent infection
- Flail joint
- Deltoid or Rotator Cuff paralysis
- Charcot joint
- Severe loss of bone stock
- Non compliant patient
D>Design
- Unconstrained
- Good / Excellent > 90%
- ± Glenoid resurfacing
- Rely on intact rotator cuff & deltoid
- Humeral component designed to
- Stable proximal humeral fixation
- Preserve cuff attachment
- Glenoid component designed to
- Stable glenoid fixation
- Preserve subchondral bone
- Types
- Neer prosthesis & Rockwood’s Global (De Puy) prosthesis
- Bigliani-Flatow (Zimmer) & Randelli (Lima) are modern modular variants
- Semiconstrained
- Hooded glenoid component
- Constrained
- Ball in socket
- High loosening & failure rates
- Periarticular fracture
- Loose glenoid
- Salvage procedure only for
- Tumours
- Irreparable massive cuff tears
- Flail shoulders
- Arthrodesis probably better option
Fixa>Fixation techniques
ul class="wp-block-list">- HA coated
Hume>Humerus
ul class="wp-block-list">GlenoidGlenoid
ss="wp-block-list">- Poly may separate from backing
- Asymmetric wear on posterior glenoid can lead to metallic debris
- attempt to reduce rim contact during humeroglenoid translation
- Ease of revision
- Tensioning of soft tissues – lateralise the stem & so improve fulcrum for cuff
- Fracture treatment
Preoperative>Preoperative Assessment
="wp-block-list">Require
- Functioning/ Repairable Cuff
- Maintain stability
- Maintain centre of joint rotation
- Intact Deltoid
- No joint instability
Investigatio>Investigations
p>- AP, Lateral & Axillary views
- AP GHJ view with IR & ER
- Assess humeral head & wear
- Superior head migration
- Osteophyte formation
- ACJ
- Thickness & diameter of humeral canal
- Humeral shaft deformity
- Axillary view
- Assess amount & position of glenoid wear
- Posterior bone deficient in Osteoarthritis
- Medial bone deficient in RA
- Extent of medial migration
- Position of humeral head
- Lateral view
- Anterior or Posterior translation seen
- Position of tuberosities
CT Scan
- assess bone deficiency
- help to plan bone graft requirements
Surgical Tec>Surgical Technique
="wp-block-heading">Preop >Preop="wp-block-list">Positioning<>Positioning
="wp-block-list">Incision &am>Incision & Approach
="wp-block-list">- Start
- Deltoid origin clavicle above coracoid
- Over
- apex of axilla
- To
- Deltoid insertion
- Minimum 17mm below coracoid
- Average 31mm
- osteotomy
- released
- Off the humerus with 2cm cuff
- Capsule released off the humerus
- Anteriorly 12 o’clock to 6 o’clock
- Anteroinferior capsule excised
- ER to deliver the humeral head
Osteotomy
>Osteotomyss="wp-block-embed-youtube wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio">- Put in 35° of ER to obtain correct retroversion
- Flex elbow
- Use forearm as protractor
- Less retroversion in
- Recurrent posterior dislocation
- Deficient posterior glenoid
- Neck Cut
- 135°
- Above the tuberosities at articular margin of head
Stem & Head<>Stem & Head
-block-list">- 15mm deep head normally
- 22mm deep head useful in cuff arthropathy
- Head must sit above greater tuberosity 3-5mm
- Articulated concentrically with glenoid & CA arch
- Small enough to close subscapularis
- Descent 1/2 head
- AP displacement 1/4 head
Glenoid
<>Glenoidblock-list">- Angled component
- Bone graft
Closure
<>Closureblock-list">Postoperative
>Postoperativelock-list">Results
Resultslock-list">- good 90%
- variable
- Osteoarthritis with intact cuff – 120° elevation
- Posterior fracture or huge cuff tear – 40° elevation
- comparable to other joints
- 90% survival (ie 10% revision) at 10 years for Osteoarthritis (Cofield)
- Ie. good mid-term results
- Results after trauma are inferior
- 90% survival (ie 10% revision) at 10 years for Osteoarthritis (Cofield)
Special CircumstancesSpecial Circumstances
ist">- Recognised on XR as large anteroinferior osteophyte
- Axillary view reveals asymmetric wear with posterior glenoid deficiency
- Loose bodies common & sought after at surgery
- Remember glenoid deficiency may need to be addressed
- Severe bony & soft tissue destruction the rule
- Severe superior & medial glenoid wear common
- Cuff tears 30%
- Osteoporosis
- AC joint disease
- Always cement the humeral component because of the osteoporosis
- May need to use only large humeral component if glenoid bone stock insufficient
- Post op rehabilitation altered due to other limb involvement
- Recognised by osteophyte formation on humeral head & Hill-Sach’s lesion on axillary view
- May require Subscapularis lengthening to allow ER particularly if previous surgery for instability
- Malunion or nonunion of the tuberosities
- Associated nerve injuries
- Shortened subscapularis
- Humeral head collapse & malalignment
- Bone loss from neck of humerus
Complications
I>Complicationsy
- Loosening of component ~ 5-40%
- Glenohumeral instability ~ 5-10%
- Rotator cuff tear ~ 5%
- Periprosthetic fracture < 2%
- Infection
- Failure of implant (incl dissociation of modular prosthesis)
- Weakness/ dysfunction of deltoid
- Aseptic loosening
- Symptomatic loosening responsible for 1/3 of complications
- 1. Glenoid Component loosening
- Radiolucent line seen in 30-50% postop of which more than 90% seen on initial postoperative radiographs (Neer 1982)
- Others have reported high incidence of radiolucent lines (eg 84% at 12 years, Torchia & Cofield)
- Incidence of clinical loosening (shift in component or radiolucent line >1.5-2mm) lower & varies from 2%-45%
- New designs include press-fit uncemented implants, plasma-sprayed implants, & tissue-ingrowth implants
- Current methods to enhance fixation & durability of the glenoid include
- Preservation of the subchondral plate
- Spherical reaming to optimise osseous support
- New glenoid designs & biomaterials
- Use glenoid component with larger radius of curvature than corresponding humeral head
- 2. Humeral Component loosening
- Subsidence & complete radiolucent lines not uncommon
- Radiolucent lines more common in humeral components inserted without cement
- Clinical findings associated with loosening rare
- 1. Glenoid Component loosening